[Salon] Peter Thiel, the Right’s Would-Be Kingmaker - The New York Times



Like the “pre-liberal” political theorists; Willmoore Kendall, Leo Strauss, George Carey, and Yoram Hazony, all inter-connected as to their major writings (exclusive of a “particular” position they may have taken in a particular moment of time or in regard to a particular war) in an ideological line of descent of “anti-liberalism,” from fascist ideologist Carl Schmitt as described pretty well in this first video link below, I too believe it is the “basic issues” of political difference one must look to, to see the "essence” of each. (Though I’m on the opposite side of those named above, as a (small l) liberal. Not "Classical Liberal," as the Nietzschean Libertarians mucked that up too with their expropriation of that term.)

 As explained in the attached file below, and in the top link. Both of which explain the “anti-liberalism” of the so-called “New Right” (as Kendall’s Conservative Movement founding was also called). What they all share in common, and expressed in various ways as denunciations of the Enlightenment, or in the case of Kendall and Carey, denunciations of the document produced out of Enlightenment thought, the "final” version of the U.S. Constitution arising out of the Constitutional Convention with the addition of the Bill Of Rights, the “1789 Constitution” which they vehemently denounced. Asserting instead that the "1787 Constitution,” the “Philadelphia Constitution,” that is, the "pre-Bill of Rights Constitution" which created the “form" of our government, was the only “legitimate” Constitution we had. As opposed to the one which achieved what the Revolution had been fought “against,” an authoritarian despotism which asserted the right to imprison citizens for their speech and/or beliefs, enforced by martial law when necessary. The Bill of Rights of 1789 completed that Revolution, as men and women had sacrificed so much for. 

To Kendall and Carey, that (the Bill of Rights) made the 1789 Constitution illegitimate; a belief expressed down to the present day by the likes of “Originalist” Bill Barr when as AG under Trump, in front of the ultra-right wing Straussian Hillsdale College  he delivered a speech declaring the Bill Of Rights not “really” part of the Constitution, or words to that effect. A speech which I shared here and made before Trump lost the 2020 election. But just as the failure of an attempted coup in Munich in 1923 did not bring an end to the Movement which had attempted it, the Movement which failed as well in 2021 in taking over Congress to force the electoral decision they demanded, lives on, with Peter Thiel, Charles Koch, and Miriam Adelson continuing to play a central role in that, as they did in getting Trump elected in 2016. With the same ideological sustenance of the 1923 Coup by ideas like Carl Schmitt's! Exported to the U.S. with the arrival of Schmitt’s co-ideologist Leo Strauss, and found to be held in common by like-minded, native-born political theorist, Willmoore Kendall (see "Basic Issues” below): 

Attachment: Basic Issues Between Conservatives and Liberals.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Attachment: The Right’s American Philosophers - Intercollegiate Studies Institute.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

(From above)

“[J]ust as Machiavelli establishes intimacy with his

readers by causing them to commit his blasphemies,

you establish intimacy with your readers by causing

them to commit the acts of piety to which you seek to

lead them.”

—Willmoore Kendall, letter to Leo Strauss, January 24,

1960


Contrary to the Cognitive War meme conjured up for Trump in that Cognitive Campaign that he would present himself as a “Restrainer” (Clinton was using the same tactics, though opposite focus, but in full agreement with Trump on the “need” of a massive military exercising power throughout the world, under a "Unitary Executive”), Trump delivered on his additional promises that he would build the US military into the Greatest Military Ever. And put it to use against Iran immediately with Netanyahu in their “clandestine war” against Iran, and continued the military encirclement of China and Russia, while tightening the choking sanctions which were on them already. So the “lesson learned” should have been that any political analysis of this political phenomenon had to be “thick,” and not “thin,” in terms used for qualitative research of politics. 

Which calls for "critical analysis,” or “textual analysis” (a method which is the one thing I agree with Kendall on), of what, in the case of the “Thielian New Right,” is the type of duplicitous language Orwell warned us of. As one sees in J.D. Vance and other Thielian politicians. In the top link, he sounds “sensible” about Iraq, but notice the anti-Iran subtext, and the segue into inciting war against China, under the auspices of the ultra-hawkish Heritage Foundation, notwithstanding their supposedly “flipping the script,” per QI:

Senator JD Vance delivers an address at Heritage's 50th Anniversary Leadership Summit.
It takes no imagination to know how Vance lines up on Israeli genocide: 


To know the “essence” of the New Right, or what I believe is more appropriately seen as equivalent to: “New Fascism,” as they’ve “taken their mask off.” One must know some of Carl Schmitt to see their essence, with this a good introduction, though a little too gentle on him: 
Carl Schmitt: The Concept of the Political

Peter Thiel, the Right’s Would-Be Kingmaker - The New York Times

Peter Thiel in Manhattan in 2016.Andrew White for The New York Times

The Right’s Would-Be Kingmaker

Peter Thiel, one of Donald J. Trump’s biggest donors in 2016, has re-emerged as a prime financier of the Make America Great Again movement.

By Ryan Mac and Lisa Lerer

Ryan Mac, who is based in Los Angeles, covers the intersection of technology and power. Lisa Lerer, who is based in New York, is a national political correspondent covering campaigns, elections and political power.

The wine flowed. Donald Trump Jr. mingled with the guests. And Peter Thiel, the tech billionaire and host of the event, had a message for the well-heeled crowd: It was time to clean house.

The fund-raiser at Mr. Thiel’s Miami Beach compound last month was for a conservative candidate challenging Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming for a spot on the ballot in November’s midterm elections. Ms. Cheney, one of several Republicans who had voted to impeach President Donald J. Trump on charges of inciting the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol, was the face of “the traitorous 10,” Mr. Thiel said, according to two people with knowledge of the event, who were not authorized to speak publicly. All of them had to be replaced, he declared, by conservatives loyal to the former president.

Mr. Thiel, who became known in 2016 as one of the biggest donors to Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign, has re-emerged as a key financier of the Make America Great Again movement. After sitting out the 2020 presidential race, the venture capitalist this year is backing 16 Senate and House candidates, many of whom have embraced the lie that Mr. Trump won the election.

To get these candidates into office, Mr. Thiel has given more than $20.4 million. That essentially puts him and Kenneth Griffin, the chief executive of the hedge fund Citadel, in a tie as the largest individual donors to Republican politics this election cycle, according to the nonpartisan research organization OpenSecrets.

What sets Mr. Thiel’s spending apart, though, is its focus on hard-right candidates who traffic in the conspiracy theories espoused by Mr. Trump and who cast themselves as rebels determined to overthrow the Republican establishment and even the broader American political order. These campaigns have raised millions in small-dollar donations, but Mr. Thiel’s wealth could accelerate the shift of views once considered fringe to the mainstream — while making himself a new power broker on the right.

“When you have a funder who is actively elevating candidates who are denying the legitimacy of elections, that is a direct assault on the foundation of democracy,” said Lee Drutman, a senior fellow at the left-leaning group New America, who studies campaign finance and hyperpartisanship.

The candidates Mr. Thiel has funded offer a window into his ideology. While the investor has been something of a cipher, he is currently driven by a worldview that the establishment and globalization have failed, that current immigration policy pillages the middle class and that the country must dismantle federal institutions.

Mr. Thiel has started articulating his thinking publicly, recently headlining at least six conservative and libertarian gatherings where he criticized the Chinese Communist Party and big tech companies and questioned climate science. He has taken issue with what he calls the “extreme dogmatism” within establishment institutions, which he said had sent the country backward.

At an October dinner at Stanford University for the Federalist Society, he spoke about the “deranged society” that “a completely deranged government” had created, according to a recording of the event obtained by The New York Times. The United States was on the verge of a momentous correction, he said.

“My somewhat apocalyptic, somewhat hopeful thought is that we are finally at a point where things are breaking,” Mr. Thiel said.

Mr. Thiel, 54, has not publicly said what he believes about the 2020 election. But in Mr. Trump, he sees a vessel to push through his ideological goals, three people close to the investor said. The two men met recently in New York and at the former president’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Fla. Mr. Thiel also funded an app company run by John McEntee, one of Mr. Trump’s closest aides, two people with knowledge of the deal said.

Unlike traditional Republican donors who have focused on their party’s winning control of Congress and the White House, Mr. Thiel has set his sights on reshaping the Republican agenda with his brand of anti-establishment contrarianism, said Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s former chief strategist.

“I don’t think it’s just about flipping the Senate,” said Mr. Bannon, who has known Mr. Thiel since 2016. “I think Peter wants to change the direction of the country.”

Mr. Thiel’s giving is expected to make up just a small fraction of the hundreds of millions of dollars that are likely to flow through campaigns this cycle. But the amounts he is pouring into individual races and the early nature of his primary donations have put him on the radar of Republican hopefuls.

In the past, many courted the billionaire Koch brothers or Sheldon Adelson, the casino magnate, who died in 2021. This year, they have clamored for invitations to Mr. Thiel’s Los Angeles and Miami Beach homes, or debated how to at least get on the phone with him, political strategists said.

Mr. Thiel personally vets the candidates he gives to, said three Republican strategists, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation. In addition to Harriet Hageman, the challenger to Ms. Cheney, he is backing Joe Kent and Loren Culp, both of whom are running against House Republicans in Washington State who voted to impeach Mr. Trump. He also gave to a political action committee associated with Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, who is not up for re-election this year.

The Republican politicians Peter Thiel is backing

Mr. Thiel has given more than $20.4 million to support 16 Senate and House candidates for the midterm elections. He also has donated to a PAC supporting Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who isn’t up for re-election this year.

Incumbent

Senate

Ted Budd

N.C.

Ted Cruz

Texas

Blake Masters

Ariz.

Eric Schmitt

Mo.

J.D. Vance

Ohio

House

Tom Cole

Okla.

Loren Culp

Wash.

Mario Díaz-Balart

Fla.

Mike Gallagher

Wis.

Harriet Hageman

Wyo.

Brian Harrison

Texas

Joe Kent

Wash.

Kevin McCarthy

Calif.

Michael McCaul

Texas

Chris Stewart

Utah

Michael Waltz

Fla.

Patrick Witt

Ga.

By The New York Times

Mr. Thiel has attracted the most attention for two $10 million donations to the Senate candidates Blake Masters in Arizona and J.D. Vance in Ohio. Like Mr. Thiel, the men are tech investors with pedigrees from elite universities who cast themselves as antagonists to the establishment. They have also worked for the billionaire and been financially dependent on him. Mr. Masters, the chief operating officer of Thiel Capital, the investor’s family office, has promised to leave that job before Arizona’s August primary.

Mr. Thiel, who declined to comment for this article, announced last week that he would leave the board of Meta, the parent company of Facebook, which conservatives have accused of censorship. One reason for the change: He plans to focus more on politics.

A Moneyman’s Evolution

Born in West Germany and raised in South Africa and the San Francisco Bay Area, Mr. Thiel showed his provocative side at Stanford in the late 1980s. Classmates recalled Mr. Thiel, who studied philosophy and law, describing South Africa’s apartheid as a sound economic system. (A spokesman for Mr. Thiel has denied that he supported apartheid.)

Mr. Thiel also helped found The Stanford Review, a conservative campus paper that sought to provide “alternative views” to what he deemed left-wing orthodoxy.

In 1995, he co-wrote a book, “The Diversity Myth,” arguing that “the extreme focus on racism” had caused greater societal tension and acrimony. Rape, he and his co-author, David Sacks, wrote, sometimes included “seductions that are later regretted.” (Mr. Thiel has apologized for the book.)

In 1998, Mr. Thiel helped create what would become the digital payments company PayPal. He became Facebook’s first outside investor in 2004 and established the venture capital firm Founders Fund a year later. Forbes puts his fortune at $2.6 billion.

As a venture capitalist, Mr. Thiel branded himself as a contrarian. He published philosophical essays, often dark musings on politics, technology, Christianity and globalization.

In one 2009 piece, Mr. Thiel, who called himself a libertarian, wrote that he had come to “no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible,” arguing that American politics would always be hostile to free-market ideals, and that politics was about interfering with other people’s lives without their consent. Since then, he has hosted and attended events with white nationalists and alt-right figures.

His political giving evolved with those views. He donated lavishly to Ron Paul’s 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns before turning to candidates who were more extreme than the Republican establishment.

In 2013, Curtis Yarvin, an entrepreneur who has voiced racist beliefs and said democracy was a destructive system of government, emailed Mr. Thiel. Mr. Yarvin wrote that Mr. Cruz, then a newly elected senator, “needs to purge every single traitor” from the Republican Party. In the email, which The Times obtained, Mr. Yarvin argued that it didn’t matter if those candidates lost general elections or cost the party control in Congress.

Mr. Thiel, who had donated to Mr. Cruz’s 2012 campaign, replied, “It’s relatively safe to support Cruz (for me) because he threatens the Republican establishment.”

Mr. Thiel used his money to fund other causes. In 2016, he was revealed as the secret funder of a lawsuit that targeted Gawker Media, which had reported he was gay. Gawker declared bankruptcy, partly from the costs of fighting the lawsuit.

Mr. Thiel speaking at the Republican National Convention in 2016.Doug Mills/The New York Times

In July 2016, Mr. Thiel appeared at the Republican National Convention to proclaim that he was proud to be a gay Republican supporting Mr. Trump. He later donated $1.25 million to the candidate.

After Mr. Trump won, Mr. Thiel was named to the president-elect’s executive transition team. At a meeting with tech leaders at Trump Tower in Manhattan in December 2016, Mr. Trump told Mr. Thiel, “You’re a very special guy.”

A month later, Mr. Thiel, a naturalized American, was revealed to have also obtained citizenship in New Zealand. That prompted a furor, especially after Mr. Trump had urged people to pledge “total allegiance to the United States.”

During Mr. Trump’s presidency, Mr. Thiel became frustrated with the administration. “There are all these ways that things have fallen short,” he told The Times in 2018.

In 2020, he stayed on the sidelines. His only notable federal election donation was to Kris Kobach, a Trump ally and former secretary of state of Kansas known for his hard-line views on immigration. (Mr. Kobach lost his primary bid for the Senate.)

Mr. Thiel’s personal priorities also changed. In 2016, he announced that he was moving from San Francisco to Los Angeles. The next year, he married a longtime boyfriend, Matt Danzeisen; they have two children.

Mr. Thiel reduced his business commitments and started pondering leaving Meta’s board, which he had joined in 2005, two of the people with knowledge of his thinking said. At an October event held by a conservative tech group in Miami, he alluded to his frustration with Facebook, which was increasingly removing certain kinds of speech and had barred Mr. Trump.

“I will take QAnon and Pizzagate conspiracy theories any day over a Ministry of Truth,” he said.

A Meta spokeswoman said the company valued and had benefited from Mr. Thiel’s contributions.

Mr. Thiel reappeared in political circles. In August, he bought a $13 million mansion in Washington from Wilbur Ross, Mr. Trump’s commerce secretary. In October, he spoke at the event for the Federalist Society at Stanford and at the National Conservatism Conference.

He also rebuilt his relationship with Mr. Trump. Since the 2020 election, they have met at least three times in New York and at Mar-a-Lago, sometimes with Mr. Masters or Mr. Vance. And Mr. Thiel invested in Mr. McEntee’s company, which is building a dating app for conservatives called the RightStuff.

Mr. McEntee declined to answer questions about his app and said Mr. Thiel was “a great guy.” Mr. Trump’s representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

Giving to Win

Mr. Thiel’s political giving ramped up last spring with his $10 million checks to PACs supporting Mr. Vance and Mr. Masters. The sums were his biggest and the largest ever one-time contributions to a PAC backing a single candidate, according to OpenSecrets.

Like Mr. Trump in 2016, Mr. Vance and Mr. Masters lack experience in politics. Mr. Vance, the venture capitalist who wrote the best-selling memoir “Hillbilly Elegy,” met Mr. Thiel a decade ago when the billionaire delivered a lecture at Yale Law School, where Mr. Vance was a student.

Mr. Thiel, right, with then President-elect Donald J. Trump at a meeting with tech industry leaders in December 2016.Kevin Hagen for The New York Times

Mr. Vance later worked at Mithril Capital, one of Mr. Thiel’s investment funds, before opening his own fund in Ohio, Narya Capital, in which Mr. Thiel is an investor. Mr. Vance took home more than $400,000 in salary from Narya in 2020 and the first half of 2021, according to financial disclosures.

Mr. Masters met Mr. Thiel when he was a Stanford law student in 2012 and the investor taught a class on start-ups. The two later co-wrote a best-selling business book, “Zero to One.” In 2020, Mr. Masters reported more than $1.1 million in salary from Thiel Capital and book royalties.

Mr. Vance, Mr. Masters and their campaigns did not respond to requests for comment.

Both candidates have repeated the Trumpian lie of election fraud, with Mr. Masters stating in a November campaign ad, “I think Trump won in 2020.” They have also made Mr. Thiel a selling point in their campaigns.

In November, Mr. Vance wrote on Twitter that anyone who donated $10,800 to his campaign could attend a small group dinner with him and Mr. Thiel. Mr. Masters offered the same opportunity for a meal with Mr. Thiel and raised $550,000 by selling nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, of “Zero to One” digital art that would give holders “access to parties with me and Peter.”

Mr. Thiel’s backing has prompted other tech investors to support the two candidates. Mr. Sacks, the co-author of “The Diversity Myth” and now an investor, hosted a fund-raiser for Mr. Vance. Joe Lonsdale, a venture capitalist, held one for Mr. Masters.

Mr. Thiel has also made smaller donations to Trump loyalists, including in September to Ms. Hageman and Patrick Witt, a former Trump administration official running for a House seat in Georgia.

His backing may not be enough. In Ohio, Mr. Vance trails in polling, partly hampered by a previous denunciation of Mr. Trump. In Arizona, Mr. Masters is competing in a crowded field.

Still, some Republicans worry that Mr. Thiel is arming candidates who are too extreme with financial firepower, fueling what could be politically detrimental primary races.

“You have to nominate candidates who can win in the fall and not just damage everyone on the way,” said Scott Reed, a longtime Republican strategist.

But Mr. Thiel appears ready to press forward. In a 20-minute speech at the National Conservatism Conference in October, he said nationalism was “a corrective” to the “brain-dead, one-world state” of globalism. He also blasted the Biden administration.

“We have the zombie retreads just busy rearranging the deck chairs,” he said. “We need dissident voices more than ever.”

Cade Metz contributed reporting. Rachel Shorey and Kitty Bennett contributed research.



On Dec 10, 2023, at 1:23 PM, Todd Pierce <todd.e.pierce@icloud.com> wrote:

Quote from shared article at bottom: "The companies listed here have provided Israel with weapons and other military equipment used in its so-called “Swords of Iron” attacks in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria during October-December 2023."


They missed this one, of National Conservative, New Right Peter Thiel’s: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-war-palantir-military-tech-firm-backing-war-gaza-awarded-uk-nhs-data-contract
BLUF: "Palantir, which has an office in Tel Aviv, has been outspoken in its support for Israel.
In a social media post on 12 October, it said: “Certain kinds of evil can only be fought with force. Palantir stands with Israel.” (TP-Nazi Carl Schmitt’s, and Thiel’s ideological mentor’s, “Friend -Enemy Distinction,” the fundamental basis of Fascism). 

"In a letter to shareholders issued on 2 November, the company said: “We are one of a few companies in the world to stand up and announce our support for Israel, which remains steadfast.”

. . . 

"Palantir was founded in 2004 with some funding provided by a CIA-backed venture capital firm and provides services to the US military and intelligence agencies, as well as to armed forces in the UK and other western countries.

"Another co-founder, and Palantir’s current chair, is Peter Thiel, a technology billionaire who also co-founded PayPal and backed Donald Trump’s winning US presidential campaign in 2016.

"In 2017, Haaretz reported that Palantir was one of two technology companies providing predictive systems used for intelligence at Israeli security organisations that the newspaper linked to the arrests of scores of Palestinians based on profiling of their social media activity."

And they missed this “New Right, National Conservative,” aka “Right-wing Peacenik” supporter, MSAIC (Military Surveillance Assassination Industrial Complex) firm:  https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/26/technology/anduril-military-palmer-luckey.htmlhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/andurilindustries_the-modern-battlefield-activity-7120146690317156353-Mq_v/:  "But a growing array of venture capital firms see things differently. Anduril is backed by several notable ones, including Founders Fund, created by the PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel; Andreessen Horowitz; and General Catalyst."

Little wonder Thiel is so supportive of Israel’s genocidal war, when he’s so loyal to Israel’s Fascist Settler Movement: 



With this as another one, of one of Thiel’s fellow “MSAIC Oligarchs”: 
"From the early months of the war, SpaceX’s Starlink, the Elon Musk-founded satellite internet service, had played a critical role for frontline Ukrainian troops. But small drones and a denser collection of satellites are also helping to provide the capacity for pervasive surveillance, allowing Ukraine to identify and track threats and targets constantly.” And don’t overlook Musk’s role in surveillance of our biometric data:

"Back in July, a proposed class action lawsuit was brought against X, accusing it of storing biometric data without users' consent. The plaintiff alleged that X collected and stored identifying information from every photo with a face in it that was uploaded to the platform.

Here’s what Thiel’s “venture capital firm,” with J.D. Vance and other politicians Thiel promotes, coming out of that, as “Right-wing Peaceniks” haha
"The letter, sent to defence secretary Lloyd Austin on Friday, was signed by marquee venture capital firms that have invested hundreds of millions of dollars into fledgling defence tech companies over recent years.”

Which is a “Network Listing” of the "New Right Blob,” in the process of supplanting “Old Right Blob,” or as The American Conservative and Quincy Institute called it” Fighting the Blob.” 
But not all media sites fell for Thiel’s cognitive war meme: 

Which leads me to suspect Thiel’s money helps support Heritage now, as an essential part of the MSAIC: 
"Mr. Stoll is wrong, however, to group the Heritage Foundation with those attacking “the modern arsenal of democracy.” We decided to refuse funding from the defense industry, but that isn’t because we oppose American power like the left does. It’s because we want to offer clearsighted analysis to the U.S. military, which has limited resources and faces multiplying threats, without even the appearance of outside influence.
(Except for Billionaire Oligarchs now disproportionately funding Heritage I would guess, beginning with Peter Thiel, Charles Koch, Elon Musk,  all members in good standing of the “New Military/Surveillance Industrial Complex.” And all promoted Heritage for its “Foreign Policy Third-Way”: https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/defense-foreign-policy-third-way”)
"That’s why Heritage has supported and continues to support responsible military aid to Ukraine.)


It’s not hard to see “whose water” “right-wing peacenik” Heritage Foundation is carrying:
"From autonomous systems to robotics to all-domain command and control systems, these start-ups are coupling dynamism with an explicit desire to solve America’s national security issues.For example:
. . . 
"New entrant Anduril’s autonomous underwater vehicles and
AI-driven software and hardware layering systems led to multiple government contracts, including one worth almost $1 billion in 2022, and a valuation nearing at least $7 billion.21 At a July 2022 conference, Palmer Luckey, Anduril’s founder and former Facebook employee, reportedly noted that his former company and other Big Tech plat-forms use their resources and world-class talent primarily to build “tech toys and social apps” instead of committing to more serious U.S. national security applications."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/25/palantir-ceo-rips-silicon-valley-in-letter-to-investors.html
  • "In Palantir’s filing to go public on Tuesday, CEO Alex Karp said Silicon Valley engineers may be able to build good software but they don’t know “how society should be organized or what justice requires.” (See Leo Strauss for definition: "doing good to friends and harm to enemies.”)
  • "Karp co-founded Palantir in 2003 with venture capitalist Peter Thiel and others."
"Palantir, a Silicon Valley software and services company founded in 2003 with the explicit purpose of helping the intelligence community with counterterrorism investigations, filed its paperwork to go public on Tuesday. Karp, who started the company with venture capitalist Peter Thiel, among others, railed on tech culture and practices in his letter from the CEO."

With this on Anduril, as celebrated on Fox News just last Sunday:



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.